NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3/NN_1993_3.iso/spool/talk/abortion/58395

Internet Message Format | 1993-01-28 | 1.6 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!news
From: [e-mail] (Paul Brinkley)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: The issue is abortion, not choice
Date: 27 Jan 1993 16:55:26 -0600
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 28
Distribution: na
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <bob1.728069653@cos>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sahara.cs.utexas.edu

In article <bob1.728069653@cos> [e-mail] (Bob Blackshaw) writes:
]In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mike Cobb) writes:
]
]>For those who are personally opposed to abortion, but don't want to force their
]>opinions on anyone, and are thus "pro-choice", could you please explain why you
]>are against abortion, if not for the reason that it causes the death of an
]>unborn child, and if it causes the death of an innocent human, why do you act
]>in favor of allowing that to continue?
]
]Well, I don't oppose it, I simply think that it would be far better to
]discover some 100% fool-proof methods of birth control, other than
]abstention (sorry, DOD, beat you to it). Abortion, IMHO since I'm
]not likely to ever undergo the process, is not in the same ballpark
]as having a root canal (now this I do know about). Ergo, lets put
]some R&D into finding that 100% method.
]
]>MAC
]
]Grouch.

I'll drink to that, Grouch.
(Except I'm only 20.  But I'm Catholic!  But I don't drink at the masses,
either.  *sigh*  Oh well...)

Paul Brinkley
[e-mail]
Pro-Humor Advocate