home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 58370 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-28  |  1.0 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!usc!sdd.hp.com!nobody
  2. From: regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard)
  3. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  4. Subject: Re: Christian Pro-Choicers
  5. Date: 28 Jan 1993 08:11:04 -0800
  6. Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
  7. Lines: 15
  8. Message-ID: <1k90ioINN5gb@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
  9. References: <lmdaugINNiol@ar-rimal.cs.utexas.edu> <1993Jan27.134912.5161@hemlock.cray.com> <lme8pmINNbc7@sahara.cs.utexas.edu>
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdde.sdd.hp.com
  11.  
  12. In article <lme8pmINNbc7@sahara.cs.utexas.edu> brinkley@cs.utexas.edu (Paul Brinkley) writes:
  13.  
  14. >Oh, and I believe it was you, Muriel, who wrote that "unborn child" has
  15. >too high an emotional content in another thread.  (Was it you?)
  16.  
  17. Actually, the complaint I've usually seen is that 'unborn child' is
  18. inaccurate and/or a contention lacking support.  Fetuses aren't recognized
  19. as children are, as people with rights, in our country at this time.  Then
  20. a secondary claim is usually appended:  that the poster used 'unborn
  21. child' as an emotional appeal. 
  22.  
  23. These are two separate things.
  24.  
  25. Adrienne Regard
  26.  
  27.