home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!das.wang.com!ulowell!m2c!nic.umass.edu!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!news.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!news
- From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Does James Keegan support Cochran's mandatory sterilization program?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.225519.20432@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 22:55:19 GMT
- References: <1993Jan24.090739.1885@netcom.com> <1993Jan24.153318.10342@ncsu.edu> <1993Jan24.234010.22096@watson.ibm.com> <1993Jan25.010941.27047@ncsu.edu>
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
- Distribution: na
- Organization: The Village Waterbed
- Lines: 19
- News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.16f by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- Nntp-Posting-Host: margoli.watson.ibm.com
-
- In <1993Jan25.010941.27047@ncsu.edu> dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan24.234010.22096@watson.ibm.com>
- >margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
- >>dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >>>ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
- >
- >>>> Why? Don't you support mandatory (forced) reversable pregnancy?
- >
- >>> No,
- >
- >> Funny, I thought you had stated that you are in favor of forcing women
- >> to remain pregnant.
- >
- >I don't know of anyone who favors forcing women to remain pregnant.
-
- Thanks for the correction. You *support* forcing women to remain
- pregnant, but you don't *favor* it.
- --
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-