home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:58043 alt.abortion.inequity:6741
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Subject: Re: sexist assumptions
- Message-ID: <C1Gu0C.AML@cs.psu.edu>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 14:38:35 GMT
- References: <1993Jan24.234115.25497@watson.ibm.com> <C1F7A5.D7A@cs.psu.edu> <1k221dINNm3l@gap.caltech.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Lines: 26
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
-
- peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >
- >>The law states that any man must support the child of a woman
- >>who shares his last name.
- >
- >I very much doubt that.
-
- I almost have to laugh! Are you serious?
-
- Well, you've deleted the rest of the context, but perhaps you now
- want to enter a debate about whether in fact Man A and Man B exist,
- or whether Thing 1 and Thing 2 are really friends of the Cat in the Hat?
-
-
- >Perhaps you're referring to the assumption of paternity in marriage?
- >(i.e., that a man is assumed to be the father of children born to
- >his wife while they are married, unless proven otherwise)
-
- No, I wasn't. I made suppositions about a Man A and several other
- fictitious things, and even after you deleted the context, your
- response seems silly.
-
- Don
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-