home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!psuvax1!psuvm!kel111
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 00:43:33 EST
- From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Message-ID: <93026.004333KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: control
- References: <lm8rioINNgt7@ar-rimal.cs.utexas.edu>
- <1993Jan25.232920.11654@ncsu.edu> <lm96bvINNh4d@ar-rimal.cs.utexas.edu>
- <1993Jan26.032126.20304@news.columbia.edu>
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1993Jan26.032126.20304@news.columbia.edu>,
- rj24@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Robert Johnston) says:
-
- >Sorry to say this Paul, but if you take anything Doug says as the truth,
- >your thought has just flown out the window. Doug's rantings about Mark
- >are merely the results of his slighted ego, and have no basis in fact.
- >Both Doug, and Nyikos, who Doug sites, have credibility ratings of zero.
-
- Well, gee, I'm convinced. How about you, Paul? Remember, in talk.abortion,
- ALL allegations and flames and mean-spirited insults are 100% true! Keep
- that in mind, and you'll do well here. :-)
-
- (Seriously, keep doing what you're doing: trying to find something that makes
- sense once in a while. Most of the posters seem to enjoy stupid flame wars,
- but you may want to ignore those like I do. Just a suggestion.)
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Kurt E. Ludwick | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
- - - - - - - - -|
- kel111@psuvm.psu.edu | what's the opposite of Progress...?
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-