home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!destroyer!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!news
- From: sfm@manduca.neurobio.arizona.edu (Stephen Matheson)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: FETAL AGE ESTIMATES (with apology to LM about LMP)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.023929.24790@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 02:39:29 GMT
- References: <nyikos.727994815@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- Sender: news@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu
- Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group
- Lines: 114
-
- From article <nyikos.727994815@milo.math.scarolina.edu>,
- by nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos):
-
- Odd number of >'s = Peter Nyikos
- Even " " " = Larry Margolis
-
- [Massive deletia. Neither man is lying. Case closed.]
-
- >>>One little nagging point: could you tell me where I can look up these
- >>>stats myself? I want to make sure the expression LMP was used.
-
- >>The following:
- >># 50% of the 1.6 million abortions each year take place at 8 weeks or less
- >># from the last time the woman menstruated (LMP); 27% at 9-10 weeks LMP; and
- >># 12% at 11-12 weeks LMP. 6% of abortions take place at 13-15 weeks LMP;
- >># 4% at 16-20 weeks LMP; and less than 1% at 21 weeks LMP or more (0.6%).
-
- >>is a direct quote from "Facts in Brief / Abortion in the United States",
- >>published by The Alan Guttmacher Institute. I'm the one who typed it in
- >>originally, and I just double-checked it against the paper. If you
- >>doubt my word, you can write them and ask for a copy:
-
- [addresses deleted]
-
- >>>>>No, Larry, there are ways of estimating fetal age besides the woman's
- >>>>>word, and if you don't know that, your knowledge of abortion is truly
- >>>>>Lilliputian.
-
- >>>>That's estimating gestational age, not estimating time since LMP.
-
- >>>I wonder whether "gestational age" refers to time since implantation.
-
- >>My dictionary refers to time since conception, but I admit that I don't
- >>know if this is the same definition the medical references use. (An
- >>interesting question, but unrelated to the above, since LMP is what
- >>was used in the statistics given, not gestational age.)
-
- > Nowadays conception is taken to be synonymous with implantation.
-
- > "Conception is the implantation of the blastocyst. It is not synonymous
- > with fertilization." E. Hughes, ed. _OB & GYN Terminology_, Philadelphia,
- > F. A. Davis, 1972.
-
- >>>it is customary to say that pregnancy starts with implantation, not
- >>>fertilization.
-
- Okay, we have a real problem here. I am quite convinced that gestation
- begins at fertilization, and I have always used conception as a synonym
- for fertilization. I can think of simple ways to estimate the approximate
- time of fertilization. I can think of obvious ways to ascertain time
- of LMP. I'm not sure how we can know implantation time without first
- knowing something about fertilization. So, until I discover otherwise,
- I will assume that we measure pregnancy from fertilization to parturition
- (38 weeks) or from LMP to parturition (40 weeks).
-
- I realize now that the term "conception" contains unintended ambiguity.
- Great.
-
- >>Actually, I think it's more customary to refer to when the sex act took
- >>place, rather than to either implantation *or* fertilization. ("Do you know
- >>when you got pregnant?" "It was the night we went on the hay ride.")
-
- > Seems like there is a little inconsistency in the preceding few paragraphs.
-
- Fertilization could follow the hay ride-associated activities by many hours.
- Is that what you meant, Peter?
-
- [deleted bickering]
-
- >>>I merely shed doubt on the correctness of yours. As I do below.
- >>[...]
- >>>In fact, Hern writes in _Abortion Practice_, copyright 1984:
- >>>
- >>> Correlation between the sonographic estimate of fetal age
- >>> and the measured result is 0.97...whereas correlation with
- >>> the last menstrual period is only 0.62 at best and the correlation
- >>> with the physician's estimate is 0.87. [pp. 209-210]
-
- >>I don't see the point, here. LMP is Last Menstrual Period; it's obviously
- >>a way of *bracketing* when conception occurred, not pinpointing it exactly.
- >>Stephen Matheson took this into account when doing his calculations.
-
- > But part of the issue is how often the woman's recollection of LMP is
- > valid.
-
- [deleted tangential tussle]
-
- >>>>Are you suggesting that a sizable percentage of women don't know when
- >>>>their LMP was?
-
- >>>Seems like Warren Hern does that above.
-
- The inaccuracy of the LMP estimation method must be due in part to
- inaccurate recollection of the date of the LMP. But I wonder if this
- is the major contributor: we all know that menstrual cycles can have
- considerable built-in variability...
-
- >>That doesn't answer the question. First, saying that using an estimation
- >>with a month's leeway doesn't correlate well with something that attempts to
- >>pinpoint the exact age says nothing about whether the woman's statement of
- >>when the *reference point* for the first estimation occurred is accurate.
-
- A month's leeway?! Let's give LMP a little more credit than that...
-
- > A month's leeway makes hash out of all claims that most abortions occur
- > in the embryonic stage.
-
- True. This discussion would be a lot more interesting if we had histograms
- instead of arbitrarily-chosen categories of time since LMP.
-
- --
-
- Steve Matheson Program in Neuroscience University of Arizona
- sfm@neurobio.arizona.edu
-