NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3/NN_1993_3.iso/spool/talk/abortion/57776

Internet Message Format | 1993-01-24 | 1.5 KB

Xref: sparky talk.abortion:57776 talk.religion.misc:27459 alt.atheism:26935
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.religion.misc,alt.atheism
Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!alexia!cobb
From: [e-mail] (Mike Cobb)
Subject: Re: Christian Pro-Choicers (was Re: An Abortion Argument that has
References: <[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Net Noise owner)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 01:45:33 GMT
Lines: 16

Rather hypocritical of them, I agree.  In all honesty, I find more interesting
things oabout the extreme pro-life crowd, or whatever they're called here, from
you guys and gals than I do from anywhere else.  I'm glad my stance, dare I
admit that I am against abortion, isn't determined by who has the nicest people
on the extreme fringes.  (Let me guess the responses to this.  1)these aren't
the fringe groups, they are the mainstream or 2)OH, so you'd support Hitler
against the Jews if he acted nicecer?!) Seriously, argue about what they stand
for, like the quote from the pamphlet given, and don't attack the person.
It's the best way to try, or at least act like we want to, resolve anything.g.

P.S. Anyone hear anything about a group of pro-life and pro-choice (tried to
give them both the most positive names) people getting together to work for
children's rights?  If so, please send info.  Thanks!

MAC