NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3/NN_1993_3.iso/spool/talk/abortion/57734

Text File | 1993-01-24 | 3.3 KB | 68 lines

Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!mcochran
From: [e-mail] (Mark A. Cochran)
Subject: Re: When is a fetus not a person?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
    of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
    control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Sender: [e-mail] (netnews admin account)
Organization: None worth mentioning.
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 93 21:28:31 GMT
Lines: 53

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
>>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>>>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
>>>>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mike Cobb) writes:
>>>>>All they want to do is say that if a woman goes
>>>>>into labor at 9 months and then decides while the baby is still inside her
>>>>>that she doesn't want it she can kill it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>as for your last statement, kindly show where any pro-choicer have
>>>>made such a statement. Or retract it.
>>>
>>>Many Extremist pro-choicers have proudly announced that they support
>>>abortion "at any time, for any reason", Mark. That certainly seems to
>>>cover the hypothetical which Mr. Cobb presented.
>>>
>>No Kebbin. Work on your reading skills. He quite specifically is
>>talking about an abortion performed during a full term labor.
>
>That falls under "at any time", does it not?
>
Back to living ini your fantasy world again, aren't you Kebbin? or is
this just another attempt by you to argue in favor of abortion
restrictions? Certainly, at any time means exactly that. is this a
problem? No, since the rest of us don't live in a fantasy land where
peopel delude themselves into thinking that abortions are performed
for trvial reason in the late term, or that people seek abortion while
they're actually in labor.
Care to address the parts you so-cleverly delted? You know, the parts
where I asked for documentation on:
1 - Documentation that any pro-choicer has advocated an abortion
during labor.
2 - Documentation that any woman has ever asked for an abortion after
starting labor.
3 - Documentation that an elective abortion has ever been performed
during labor.

Are you going to address this? Or sqiurm away via one of your little
semantic quibbles? BTW, since you seem to be in the mood to insit on
correct word choice, are you now ready to admit that schizophrenia is
not the correct word choice when one actually means multiple
personality disorder? You can't have it both ways Kibble. Either stick
to the same standards you try to hold others to, admit your error, or
admit you are a hypocrite.

--
                  Mark Cochran          [e-mail]
These are the views of my employer, your employer, your government, the
Church of your choice, and the Ghost of Elvis. So there.
Member, T.S.A.K.C.