home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!galen.med.Virginia.EDU!gjh
- From: gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis)
- Subject: Re: I became pro-life...and pro-choice...
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.211606.2921@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
- References: <1993Jan24.033340.21571@rotag.mi.org> <1993Jan24.074055.11945@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1993Jan24.165434.23402@rotag.mi.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 21:16:06 GMT
- Lines: 36
-
- In article <1993Jan24.165434.23402@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan24.074055.11945@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis) writes:
-
- >>Oh come on, Kevin, lots of tyrants have had their will enforced without
- >>benefit of law.
- >
- >Is that what you prefer? Myself, I'd ...
-
- [Kevin's fantasy deleted]
-
- Of course I didn't say anything even remotely like that.
-
- >I distinguish between "force" and "enforcement", by the way. "Force" is just
- >a general term. "Enforcement", on the other hand, implies the use of force
- >towards a particular goal. Laws reflect goals for which it is valid to use
- >force. Democracies pass laws which reflect their people's ideas of what goals
- >are valuable and what aren't. It actually works, Galen. You'd be surprised.
-
- The validity of using force in concert with goals, whether legal or not has
- implications I won't get into right now. Of course, I didn't bring up
- "force" at all, and I certainly didn't try to contrast it either "enforcement"
- or anything else.
-
- Oh, and Kevin, this is for you:
-
-
- TTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSS AAAAAAAAA K K CCCCCCC
- T S A A K K C
- T S A A K K C
- T SSSSSSSS AAAAAAAAA KK C
- T S A A K K C
- T S A A K K C
- T SSSSSSSS A A K K CCCCCCC
-
-
-
-