home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: I became pro-life...and pro-choice...
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.033340.21571@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <1993Jan7.005152.24701@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <C0K78n.M78@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1993Jan9.023751.29274@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 03:33:40 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1993Jan9.023751.29274@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis) writes:
- >In article <C0K78n.M78@ra.nrl.navy.mil> lebow@psl.nrl.navy.mil writes:
- >
- >[I have deleted a lot of this because you have probably read it before]
- >
- >}The fact that felons are concerned about enforcement seems a strong argument in
- >}favor of legislation.
- >
- >No, that's enforcement. Notice that "enforcement" and "legislation"
- >aren't even spelled the same way. There's a reason.
-
- Without a law, there is nothing to enforce. In order to get (would-be)
- criminals concerned about enforcement, you first have to pass laws; those same
- laws you keep insisting are useless.
-
- - Kevin
-