home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:57555 alt.politics.correct:6332
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.politics.correct
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!rock!taco!eceyv.ncsu.edu!dsh
- From: dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Subject: The pro-choice thought police in action
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.182821.8437@ncsu.edu>
- Followup-To: talk.abortion
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: NCSU
- References: <74214@cup.portal.com> <1993Jan23.182126.8180@ncsu.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 18:28:21 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- "Lawyers have no First Amendment right to use whatever
- language they want in a courtroom, the U.S. Court of
- Appeals for the Ninth Circuit made clear July 1. Thus,
- a lawyer who was representing abortion protesters at
- a criminal trial, and who contravened a court order
- not to use words such as ``murderers'' and ``killers''
- that went to defenses the trial court had excluded,
- was properly held in contempt on 20 occasions.
- Zal v. Steppe, CA 9, No. 91-55579, 7/1/92."
-
- The United States Law Week, 8/4/92, pg. 2062
-
-