home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!wri!joplin.wri.com!markp
- From: markp@joplin.wri.com (Mark Pundurs)
- Subject: Re: "Absolute Ethics" (was Re: Who are you guys?)
- Message-ID: <markp.727722667@joplin.wri.com>
- Sender: news@wri.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: joplin.wri.com
- Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
- References: <1992Dec29.235055.18645@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <markp.725731241@dragonfly.wri.com> <1993Jan8.164325.8820@advtech.uswest.com> <markp.726528552@spider.wri.com> <1l_3zzr@rpi.edu> <markp.726677398@spider.wri.com> <#g+3!fc@rpi.edu> <markp.726773334@joplin.wri.com> <q_-3=rq@rpi.edu> <markp.726855603@joplin.wri.com> <mkc33g_@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:11:07 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In <mkc33g_@rpi.edu> cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:
-
- >markp@joplin.wri.com (Mark Pundurs) writes:
-
- >>In <q_-3=rq@rpi.edu> cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:
-
- >>>Perhaps we have a fundamental communication problem here. This is the
- >>>best guess I can come up with. So let me ask a question to clarify
- >>>the basis of this discussion:
-
- >>>When you use the term "absolute ethics", do you mean a single,
- >>>comprehensive moral or ethical code which defines the ethical
- >>>action in every situation for every person?
-
- >>That's what *I* mean.
-
- >Then why didn't you address the remainder of my post, which was predicated
- >on this assumption?
-
- Rest assured, it was NOT because I found it irrefutable. I'd dredge it
- up if I knew how.
-
- > -rocker
-
- Mark Pundurs
-