home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!rpi!keegan
- From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
- Subject: Re: Keegan, "forgery," and attributions
- Message-ID: <dyk3y9d@rpi.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hermes.acm.rpi.edu
- Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
- References: <1993Jan14.023047.22232@crd.ge.com> <1j42bhINNq59@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> <nyikos.727391565@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <1993Jan19.025252.6516@crd.ge.com> <nyikos.727658850@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:06:26 GMT
- Lines: 39
-
- nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
- ->keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
- ->>nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
- ->>-> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
- ->>-> >james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
- ->>-> >>well now, let's examine that part about actions
- ->>-> >>speaking louder than words.
- ->>-> >>a couple of months ago, you falsly accused adrienne
- ->>-> >>regard of forgery.
- ->>->
- ->>-> I did not. Have you ever seen the post to which you keep referring
- ->>-> *ad nauseam*?
-
- ->>of course, you fool. i was one of the first to call
- ->>on you to apologize. see. note that the message id
- ->>in the reference line is to your post. just think,
- ->>had you apologized back then on october 27th or
- ->>shortly thereafer many fewer people would see you as
- ->>a liar.
-
- ->Yes, Keegan, I see. You have made some deletions, of course.
-
- of course. only newbies leave irrelevant context in
- follow-ups. did you never read the guidelines for new
- users?
-
- ->Including all the evidence that I "accused Adrienne of forgery".
- ->Except, of course for the thread title, which has a string of
- ->symbols beginning and ending in ? Hardly an accusation.
-
- since your entire message has since been reposted, i
- think readers will be able to form their own opinions
- about what you did and did not do.
-
- i do admit that, at that time, i thought you were a
- harmless, rather limited git, and that you'd
- immediately post an apology and move on. so, i was
- wrong about the 'harmless' part.
-
-