home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!mcochran
- From: mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran)
- Subject: Re: Younger and younger
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.062733.15059@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
- of Denver for the Denver community. The University has neither
- control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
- Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account)
- Organization: None worth mentioning.
- References: <1993Jan20.144301.8997@ncsu.edu> <1993Jan20.180226.29763@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1993Jan20.205920.27585@ncsu.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 06:27:33 GMT
- Lines: 52
-
- In article <1993Jan20.205920.27585@ncsu.edu> dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan20.180226.29763@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- >mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
- >>dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >>>cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:
- >>>>rjk@world.std.com (robert j kolker) writes:
- >
- >>>>> [.. disgusting bigotry against Mexican nationals ..]
- >>>>>
- >>>>> Bob Kolker
- >
- >>>> And this is a person that Holtsinger called "pro-choice"?
- >
- >>> He's obviously pro-choice.
- >
- >> What he supported, DODie, was forced abortion,
- >> forced sterilization,
- >
- >No, he did not support forced abortion or forced sterilization:
- >
- > "Frankly I am not in favor of involuntary anything (including
- > sterilization), niether am I in favor of being taxed to support these
- > discultured primitives."
- >
- > <C0ytpq.3CG@world.std.com>
- >
- Nice of you to delete his earlier statement in favor of forced
- sterilization DODie.
-
- >> and unmitigated racism.
- >
- >You finally got one right, Cochran.
- >
- >> That's not pro-choice
- >
- >No, he's pro-choice. He supports the legal availability
- >of abortion, just like you.
- >
- Nice of you to finally admit that I'm Pro-Choice, not Pro-Abort as you
- usually (and falsely) try to claim.
- Kolker is still not pro-choice, as his original post clearly
- indicates. Nor would it be fair, if he were pro-choice, to
- characterise the entire movement based on him. That would be as silly
- as basing a judgement of the entire pro-life side on idiots like you
- and PHoney.
-
-
- --
- Mark Cochran merlin@eddie.ee.vt.edu
- These are the views of my employer, your employer, your government, the
- Church of your choice, and the Ghost of Elvis. So there.
- Member, T.S.A.K.C.
-