home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:57194 misc.legal:23042 alt.abortion.inequity:6634 alt.child-support:4640
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,misc.legal,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.child-support
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Subject: Re: A Modest Proposal: Illegitimate-conception Tax
- Message-ID: <C183Ew.3DM@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
- References: <1993Jan18.231506.1082@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1993Jan19.040725.24918@rotag.mi.org> <1jkgjbINNeb0@gap.caltech.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:23:19 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >
- >>What do you think we have right now, Dennis? With the current laws, well-off
- >>single men are MAGNETS to the women you describe -- spend a night of pleasure,
- >>get impregnated by him, and rake in huge child support payments for 18+ years.
- >>What a deal! What a racket! *Any* child support scheme that's based on
- >>parents' ability-to-pay is going to affect people's choices of biological co-
- >>parent to some degree, yet any child support scheme which ISN'T based on
- >>parents' ability-to-pay is pretty unfair to low-income parents. It's the
- >>eternal trade-off. I think my proposal is at least a better compromise than
- >>the current system, since the economic incentives/disincentives are
- >>quantitatively smaller, and thus _less_ likely to affect anyone's choice of
- >>biological co-parent.
- >
- >You make it sound like the man has no choice in the matter.
-
- I agree, Michal. He can abstain forever, or stick to cunnilingus.
-
- Don :-|
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-