home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.men:23131 alt.feminism:7538 soc.singles:37613
- Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.feminism,soc.singles
- Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!tlode
- From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
- Subject: Re: The Nice Guy Syndrome (was: Re: Male Men Bashers)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.054955.17246@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account)
- Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
- References: <1993Jan17.014306.7372@adobe.com> <11788@sun13.scri.fsu.edu> <C17tnI.I73@panix.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 93 05:49:55 GMT
- Lines: 90
-
-
- in <C17tnI.I73@panix.com>
- gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch) writes:
-
- ] kendall@adobe.com (Janice Kendall) writes:
- ] | >OK. Let's define what "nice, sensitive guy" means...
- ] | >
- ] | >I am a woman and I wanted a "nice, sensitive guy". I've dated self-centered
- ] | >jerks and as I matured and came to care more about my own "quality of life"
- ] | >(yep - it's, arghhh, SELF-ESTEEM!), I quit seeing the self-centered jerks
- ] | >as better-than-me-and-therefore-desirable, and saw them as self-centered
- ] | >jerks not worth wasting my time on.
- ]
- ] pepke@dirac.scri.fsu.edu (Eric Pepke) writes:
- ] | Thanks for saying this. It is consistent with my experience.
- ] |
- ] | The reason I set the followups the way I did is that I want to talk about
- ] | the message that men get. The message is this:
- ] |
- ] | 1) If you're a self-centered jerk, you'll get plenty of dates.
- ] | 2) It you're a nice, sensitive guy, you may at some time acquire a long-term
- ] | partner who may or may not stop dating self-centered jerks. In the mean
- ] | time, you might as well watch Popeye cartoons to see what your forearms
- ] | are going to look like.
- ] |
- ] | This is generally called the "nice guy syndrome."
- ]
- ] I haven't found these scenarios to be true. Rather, I think
- ] that self-centered-jerkness and nice-guyness are orthogonal
- ] (as people who speak pseudomath like to say) to the ability
- ] to get dates. The reason the myth arises is, I think,
- ] because those who are poor at getting dates need to find
- ] some cause which preserves their self-esteem.
-
- Like most myths/stereotypes, I believe the "nice guy syndrome" does have
- a basis in reality--we live in a culture that is very hard on the self
- esteems of the people in it and that teaches people to think of
- themselves as "not good." Someone who has internalized such an outlook
- will tend to seek out romantic partners that reinforce their self-image
- and, further, because of this internalized self-judgment, someone who
- treats them well is neither desirable ("if she/he likes me, she/he can't
- very well be a worthwhile person") nor respected ("he/she likes me, but
- I'm not good, therefore his/her opinions are not of value.")
-
- Further, there are a lot of mental and physically abusive people out
- there--and if you are raised in an abusive environment or become
- accustomed (even addicted) to the emotional rollercoaster ride of an
- abusive relationship, then it generally takes a great deal of effort and
- determination to break out of the cycle of seeking out abusive
- relationships. Our culture has a greater tendency to reinforce women's
- negative self-images and to encourage overtly abusive behavior in men,
- so this tends to be a behavior style more often found in women than men,
- but it's hardly unknown among males either. (I've certainly known
- enough men who seem to be able to sustain a romantic interest only in
- female "jerks.")
-
- However, like most myths/stereotypes, this is by no means a universal
- behavior pattern--but to the 'nice guy' who's been dumped for classic
- jerk-types in his last six relationships, I can imagine that it might
- start to seem that way.
-
- In my experience, the men I've known who were by far the most in
- demand with women have been of the classic "jerk" type; however,
- for all the women who were turned on by the thought of being abused,
- treated like dirt, and lied to, there were at least as many who were
- turned off by it--so there is plenty of hope for the "nice guy" male.
-
- ] The other reason is that there's a social Gresham's law.
- ] Gresham's law states that bad money drives out good;
- ] currency with low "intrinsic" value tends to be circulated
- ] (people get rid of it) while that with high "intrinsic"
- ] value is kept. The same with dates: the jerks quickly get
- ] put back in circulation, while the nice guys (the real
- ] ones) are carefully sequestered and kept warm and cozy.
- ] The "success" of the jerk is usually a very temporary one;
- ] that's why he has so many to report.
-
- That's both a good point and a particularly good way of putting it--I'd
- suggest that it goes even a little further than that, since most "jerks"
- never actually go out of circulation; at least the ones I've known
- generally haven't stopped circulating no matter what their relationship
- status was--one of the more impressive classic "jerk" type was
- definitely always actively seeking new conquests, even if he was already
- engaged to several women at the time and I've known a reasonable number
- who weren't dissuaded by little details like being married.
-
- Trygve
- --
- How many Ministry of Truth employees does it take to change a light bulb?
- None--there never *was* a light bulb.
-