home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!das.wang.com!ulowell!news.bbn.com!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!udel!intercon!psinntp!panix!pw
- From: chrz@tellabs.com (Peter Chrzanowski)
- Subject: Re: thinking that numbers are God(tm)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.230753.6596@tellab5.tellabs.com>
- Summary: Women's Reality
- Sender: pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich)
- Organization: Tellabs, Inc.
- References: <1jmig5$ep4@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:35:48 GMT
- Approved: pw@panix.com
- Lines: 71
-
- [Moderator's note -- included text trimmed, since this is basically
- about the Shaef book -- pw]
- In article <1jmig5$ep4@agate.berkeley.edu>, cortese@skid.ps.uci.edu (Janis Maria Cortese) writes:
- > To follow up someone else's quote about how women don't like it when men
- > use numbers because they don't like it when they aren't right -- read
- > Schaef's _Women's Reality_. I realize most of you probably won't,
- > despite the fact that asking for hard references seems to be a major
- > pastime for most of you.
-
- The book is,
-
- Women's Reality
- An Emerging Female System in a White Male Society
- by Anne Wilson Schaef (Harper and Row, 1981)
-
- The book's thesis is
-
- THE FIRST MYTH is that the White Male System is the only thing that exists...
-
- THE SECOND MYTH is that the White Male System is innately superior...
-
- THE THIRD MYTH is that the White Male System knows and understands everything...
-
- THE FOURTH MYTH is that it is possible to be totally logical, rational, and
- objective."
-
-
- In the edition I read, the following appeared in a blurb on the bacover:
-
- "Once a woman is helped to see that her
- perceptions are valid and that it is all
- right to want to blame and feel like a
- victim, she can begin moving into the
- rage stage..."
-
-
- The idea that someone could take this book seriously is frightening to me.
-
- I thought the book could easily be classified as hate literature in that
- it offers a grand, all-encompassing system (all the world's divided into
- The White Male System and The Emerging Female System) in which most of
- the world's evils are blamed on those of a particular race and gender.
- The phrase "White Male System" appears DOZENS of times on practically
- every page of this book.
-
- In addition to being hate literature, I think the book can also be said
- to be demeaning to women in that not all women are, or would wish to be,
- the irrational, temperamental, illogical creatures presented in the
- book as characteristic of the "Emerging Female System."
-
- The author seems to glorify irrationality; after all, sweet reason is
- part of that White Male System, and mere rationality may be dismissed
- should it contradict A Woman's Feelings.
-
- It supports the some of the oldest gender cliches. Women are warm, nurturing,
- and form communities based on consensus. Men are cold, power-driven,
- and form hierarchical commumities.
-
- The author's grand System of Systems seems simplistic. Where, for
- example, do non-white men fit -- are they part of the White Male System,
- or are they part of the Emerging Female? The author doesn't say.
-
- In summary, I found this book not only hateful but also incredibly bad.
- I agree that it should stand on its own merits, however, and urge
- people to read it. I found a copy in a public library.
-
- --
- Post articles to soc.feminism, or send email to feminism@ncar.ucar.edu.
- Questions and comments should be sent to feminism-request@ncar.ucar.edu. This
- news group is moderated by several people, so please use the mail aliases. Your
- article should be posted within several days. Rejections notified by email.
-