home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.bi
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!news.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!jsb16
- From: jsb16@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jennifer S Broekman)
- Subject: Re: soc.bi Frequently Answered Questions (FAQ)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.011723.13352@news.columbia.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.columbia.edu (The Network News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
- Reply-To: jsb16@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jennifer S Broekman)
- Organization: Columbia University
- References: <9301210952.AA27168@pizzabox.demon.co.uk> <ALAN.93Jan25180821@pluto.osf.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:17:23 GMT
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <ALAN.93Jan25180821@pluto.osf.org>
- alan@osf.org (Alan Hamilton) writes:
- >:>14a. Are threesomes really that good?
- >:>
- >:> Several answers spring to mind:
- >:>
- >:> o Try it and see.
- >:>
- >:> o Actually, any biblical number should give good results. After
- >:> a threesome you should also try having sex in groups of 7 and
- >:> 40. Note: there is some dispute about whether it is biblical
- >:> numbers or the Fibonacci sequence which gives the best group
- >:> size for orgies.
-
- >These answers are great, but I'd also like to see a direct answer that
- >says something like "Some people really like them, others hate the
- >very idea. If you're interested, consider trying it. But you
- >certainly don't have to have threesomes to be bisexual."
-
- Also, you don't have to be bisexual to have/enjoy threesomes. Certainly
- M-F-M (males not touching) is as much as threesome as M---M
- \ /
- F,
- even if it's not something that tickles my personal fancy.
-
- -jenneke
-
- Only Boys Accepting Feminism Get Kissed Meaningfully -- Geoff Marcy
- The only unnatural sexual act is that which you cannot perform. - Alfred Kinsey
- jenneke is: jsb16@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
-