home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!nwnexus!jazzie!fylz!eskimo!rwing!fnx!nazgul!bright
- From: bright@nazgul.UUCP (Walter Bright)
- Newsgroups: seattle.general
- Subject: Re: SCREW - Support Citizen Reform of Educa
- Message-ID: <1588@nazgul.UUCP>
- Date: 24 Jan 93 00:02:48 GMT
- References: <C12qvE.7uI@bcstec.ca.boeing.com>
- Reply-To: bright@nazgul.UUCP (Walter Bright)
- Distribution: seattle
- Organization: Zortech, Seattle
- Lines: 63
-
- In article <C12qvE.7uI@bcstec.ca.boeing.com> hall@bcstec.ca.boeing.com (Robert J. Hall) writes:
- /> Classrooms have worked for
- /> a thousand years with a teacher, blackboard, and a room. Adding
- /> technology only provides another excuse for non-performance.
- /The national classroom allows you to recruit the best lecturers for each
- /topic - thereby improving the student's interest and attentiveness. The role
- /of the teacher will then become one of answering questions, rather than
- /talking to a bunch of half-awake students. Computers are also great for
-
- And the students won't sleep through the video?
-
- /repetitive learning - especially when the citizenry is unwilling to pay for
- /the alternative of a low teacher/student ratio.
-
- Yeah, I saw once on TV a plug for how computer aided instruction was so great
- because a student could "go back over a lesson if he didn't get it the first
- time". I thought, "just like a book!"
-
- /Granted, the old ways worked great - for the 1950's. Now we are competing with
- /the rest of the world and we need every edge we can get.
-
- I recommend we return to the old ways. Our national academic performance has
- been declining since the 50's. There is no magic, there is Reading, Writing,
- and 'Rithmetic. It's pointless to expect a computer to magically transform
- a student who can't read the screen, can't type in a command, and cannot
- formulate a problem that the computer can solve.
-
- /My experience with Calculators in high school, college, and onward, is that
- /they do not hinder learning - and may in fact encourage some less academically
- /inclined students to remain interested in their work.
-
- I'd claim that a calculator is useless to someone who doesn't know the
- multiplication tables, and who doesn't know the mathematical basis of %.
- (I've heard cries from people who couldn't figure % because their calculator
- didn't have a % key, sigh.)
-
- /IMHO, computers are not important due to their number-crunching capability,
- /but because of their infinite patience and networking capability. They are
- /also going to be everywhere in a few years and the kids might as well start
- /getting used to them.
-
- When the schools manage to teach the 3 Rs, then we can talk about extras.
-
- /While I agree that technology by itself will not improve our education system,
- /when included as part of a solid reform package, they are great 'force
- /multipliers'. (To use a military adage.)
-
- Another reason why I am disinclined to believe computers will help matters is
- because computers are fragile machines. If you get a bunch of expensive
- computers in the classroom, I expect that students will treat them with the
- same respect they treat their lockers and books, i.e. probably less than 10%
- will be functioning at any one time. When I was in school, I remember how
- well the film projectors kept functioning, and they were only handled by the
- teachers! (It was tough to find *any* that worked.)
-
- Ok, enough complaining, here's my (boring) proposal:
- o Switch to a voucher system.
- o Hold students accountable for failure, instead of blaming everything
- but them for failure to achieve.
- o Have some obvious recognition for success. For instance, when I
- graduated from high school ('75), the Valedictorian and Salutatorian
- were not mentioned in the yearbook, in fact, the entire yearbook
- was on the sportsTrges om (Dbermodems Re: Te
-