home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!opl.com!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!convex!ewright
- From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: Precursors to Fred (was Re: Sabatier Reactors.)
- Message-ID: <ewright.728173572@convex.convex.com>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 22:26:12 GMT
- References: <1993Jan26.222349.29804@iti.org> <26JAN199319493864@judy.uh.edu> <1k6aj1INNgtf@mojo.eng.umd.edu>,<1993Jan27.165812.6931@iti.org> <1k6ndgINNl2j@mojo.eng.umd.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account)
- Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
- Lines: 11
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bach.convex.com
- X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
- Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
- not necessarily those of CONVEX.
-
- In <1k6ndgINNl2j@mojo.eng.umd.edu> sysmgr@king.eng.umd.edu (Doug Mohney) writes:
-
- >So how do you suggest NASA tests hardware and flight procedures before Freedom
- >goes up?
-
- Well, if I was in a position to offer suggestions to NASA
- (if NASA was willing to listen), I'd suggest that they *stop*
- testing hardware and flight procedures for space station
- Freedom. Forget about building the ultimate whizzy-gadget
- loaded station. Just take what we already have and know
- (which is quite a lot) and *build* the damn thing already.
-