home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!sbusol.rz.uni-sb.de!coli.uni-sb.de!coli-gate.coli.uni-sb.de!spackman
- From: spackman@disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de (Stephen Spackman)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: How to write integrals (was Re: The confusion of tongues (was ...))
- Followup-To: sci.physics
- Date: 24 Jan 1993 21:01:55 GMT
- Organization: DFKI Saarbruecken GmbH, D-W 6600 Saarbruecken
- Lines: 19
- Message-ID: <SPACKMAN.93Jan24220704@disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de>
- References: <1jn1jv$k1c@agate.berkeley.edu> <1993Jan21.211430.25660@stsci.edu>
- <106364@netnews.upenn.edu>
- Reply-To: stephen@acm.org
- NNTP-Posting-Host: disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de
- In-reply-to: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu's message of 24 Jan 93 17:13:15 GMT
-
- In article <106364@netnews.upenn.edu> weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener) writes:
- |In article <1993Jan21.211430.25660@stsci.edu>, kimball@stsci (Timothy Kimball) writes:
- |>One of my first calculus teachers tried to get us to drop the dx
- |>completely, on the grounds that the integral symbol served as an
- |>operator on a function, and the x in dx was just a dummy index of
- |>integration.
- |
- |You have to at least indicate what the dummy variable is _somewhere_.
- |Mathematicians dealing with pure function symbols--ie, f, not f(x)--
- |will write Int(f) when it's convenient. Which usually means 1-D only.
-
- Ergo, the best notation ought to be Int(\x.f x) or Int(x+>f x) [where \
- is a lower-case lambda and +> is a barred arrow]. If the variable you
- want to integrate over isn't the function's first argument, you can
- always transpose it....
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- stephen p spackman +49 681 302 5288(o) 5282(sec) stephen@acm.org
- dfki / stuhlsatzenhausweg 3 / d-w-6600 saarbruecken 11 / germany
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-