home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.med:24555 talk.politics.medicine:747
- Newsgroups: sci.med,talk.politics.medicine
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!gld
- From: gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare)
- Subject: Re: Canadian healthcare system
- Message-ID: <1993Jan27.005156.21613@news.columbia.edu>
- Followup-To: talk.politics.medicine
- Sender: usenet@news.columbia.edu (The Network News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
- Reply-To: gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare)
- Organization: Deep Space Nine (DS9)
- References: <1993Jan25.130426.750@fuug.fi> <C1FC0p.6EM@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1993Jan25.233750.22223@bcrka451.bnr.ca>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:51:56 GMT
- Lines: 52
-
- seanna@bnr.ca (Seanna Watson) writes:
- >
- >The per capita cost is somewhat cheaper while providing universal
- >coverage. This is supposed to rebut the idea that it would be too
- >expensive to provide universal coverage.
-
- The secret is amortization across a VERY large population and you know
- what the statistical population looks like: a bell curve. You can set
- your premiums according to projected demand and what the doctors demand
- from your fee schedule (we have the same AMA/CMA-oriented monopoly as
- the U.S. and they get what they want).
-
- In Winnipeg, I used to go to high school with the son of the chief
- actuary from Great-West Life; his dad liked me 'cos I was one of the
- few people who could understand math ... I asked him how universal
- amortization worked, and his answer was: "Oh, long division!" (-;
-
- Basically, your skydivers and bungee-jumpers disappear in the IEEE
- floating point round-off during computer analysis.
-
- [Maybe Herman Rubin can tackle the above since he's in Stats ... but
- he's in an ivory tower, not the real world like Great-West Life so ...
- (Just kidding, Herman!!! (-; (-; (-;)]
-
- >Bear in mind that the population is 1/10 that of the US--obviously
- >a larger population can support more diversity of expertise.
-
- Most people down here don't know that ... they also think that we've
- had the NDP (Labour) in Ottawa since the Russian Revolution. (-;
-
- {Actually, the NDP have never held power in Ottawa.}
-
- >>The biggest problem is that it is run by government bureaucrats, who
- >>SO FAR have not been too bad. "To err is human; to foul things up
- >>takes a computer; to really make a mess of things takes a government."
- >
- >I certainly can't disagree with the potential for government messing
- >things up. Maybe we've just been lucky so far, and the system certainly
- >is not perfect, but I consider myself fortunate to have access to it.
-
- Herman is talking about Big Brother, the dude from "1984", not the
- data entry drones processing bills like we have in real life.
-
- Hey, if our Canadian governments were *providing* the health care you
- certainly wouldn't be seeing us all here trying to set things right!!!
-
- gld
- --
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Je me souviens ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Gary L. Dare
- > gld@columbia.EDU GO Winnipeg Jets GO!!!
- > gld@cunixc.BITNET Selanne + Domi ==> Stanley
-