home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.med,talk.politics.med
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!pop.stat.purdue.edu!hrubin
- From: hrubin@pop.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin)
- Subject: Re: Canadian healthcare system
- Message-ID: <C1FC0p.6EM@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
- Sender: news@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (USENET News)
- Organization: Purdue University Statistics Department
- References: <1993Jan25.130426.750@fuug.fi>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:12:24 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1993Jan25.130426.750@fuug.fi> an4140@anon.penet.fi writes:
-
- >I heard a radio program extolling the virtues of the Canadian national
- >health care program. The guest could find nothing wrong with it, and
- >said it ought to be the model for the US.
-
- >Surely there must be another side to this argument. Are there no
- >shortcomings to the Canadian system? And even if that were so, is
- >it adaptable to the US?
-
- There are several things wrong with it, and it is not all that much
- cheaper than the cost in the US. One generally agreed problem is that
- many "standard" procedures are not done in Canada, and while the Canadian
- plan often picks up the costs, it does not pay the travel, and it does
- not help defray the development costs, which US care does. For another,
- one must find a primary care physician, and all else must be referred
- through that doctor; I believe that changing such is difficult. Also,
- there are other cost-cutting limitations.
-
- The biggest problem is that it is run by government bureaucrats, who
- SO FAR have not been too bad. "To err is human; to foul things up
- takes a computer; to really make a mess of things takes a government."
- --
- Herman Rubin, Dept. of Statistics, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette IN47907-1399
- Phone: (317)494-6054
- hrubin@snap.stat.purdue.edu (Internet, bitnet)
- {purdue,pur-ee}!snap.stat!hrubin(UUCP)
-