home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!yale!news.wesleyan.edu!news.wesleyan.edu!news
- Newsgroups: sci.med
- Subject: more on Depression...
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.154528.654@news.wesleyan.edu>
- From: RGINZBERG@eagle.wesleyan.edu (Ruth Ginzberg)
- Date: 24 Jan 93 15:45:26 EDT
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Philosophy Dept., Wesleyan University
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eagle.wesleyan.edu
- X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20Lines: 23
- Lines: 23
-
- Re. the question of primary care physicians & diagnoses of Depression:
-
- Wasn't it only fairly recently that psychiatrists stopped tying themselves into
- knots trying to distinguish "exogenous" depression from "endogenous"
- depression? It seems to me that a compromise position has evolved ("the two
- aren't distinct; that distinction doesn't make sense; there are physiologic
- changes that occur in every depression, regardless of what precipitated it;
- etc., etc., etc."). But before such a compromise position evolved (which, as I
- recall, seems pretty recent), one of the major diagnostic tasks of the
- psychiatrist was taken to be determining whether the depression was of
- bio-chemical or of situational origin (where treatment would be different in
- each of these two cases). Now, given how complicated this differential
- diagnosis was, I can see quite easily WHY primary care physicians were
- reluctant to diagnose depression. But since this isn't thought to be a major
- distinction any more, it seems as though a major barrier to making this
- diagnosis has been removed. (Wasn't this the acheivement of DSM-III/1980?)
-
- For those interested, I will post DSM-III Diagnostic criteria for Major
- Depression in a separate post, so those un-interested in it can 'n' past it.
-
- ------------------------
- Ruth Ginzberg <rginzberg@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Philosophy Department;Wesleyan University;USA
-