home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!news.wesleyan.edu!news.wesleyan.edu!news
- Newsgroups: sci.med
- Subject: Re: Cervical Dysplasia Questions
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.101048.649@news.wesleyan.edu>
- From: RGINZBERG@eagle.wesleyan.edu (Ruth Ginzberg)
- Date: 23 Jan 93 10:10:45 EDT
- References: <1993Jan22.193603.10478@ac.dal.ca>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Philosophy Dept., Wesleyan University
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eagle.wesleyan.edu
- X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20In-Reply-To: guruman@ac.dal.ca's message of 22 Jan 93 19:36:03 -0400Lines: 80
- Lines: 80
-
- In <1993Jan22.193603.10478@ac.dal.ca> guruman@ac.dal.ca writes:
-
- > I have a few questions about cervical dysplasia, any help would be appreciated.
-
- I would like to take a stab at answering these, but I hope if I have made any
- errors that someone else will correct me. I am not a doctor.
-
- > 1) Cervical dysplasia is a a)bacteria, b)virus c) a state of cells.
-
- I believe it is a *description* of the appearance of cells under a microscope.
-
- > 2) CD is a communicable disease ?
-
- I believe it is a symptom, not a disease. Some causes of this symptom are
- communicable; some may not be.
-
- > 3) Venereal Warts are a majour cause of CD ?
-
- I don't know about this, but it sounds unlikely, given how CD is detected. It
- is usually detected via pap smear, which is usually performed on the cervix,
- not on visible venereal warts. However, if there *were* venereal warts on the
- cervix & these areas happened to be the areas swabbed in the pap smear, it
- wouldn't be at all surprising for the cytologist to find dysplastic cells, I
- wouldn't think.
-
- > if yes, must HPV be present in infected person, or is exposure to HPV
- > enough?
-
- Um, not quite sure of the focus of this question. but...
-
- Infection by HPV (Human Papilloma Virus -- of which I think there are currently
- 23 identified strains, each distinct from one another) is the usual cause of a
- cytological finding of cervical dysplasia. I should think that if a woman were
- exposed to HPV but not infected by it, there would be no evidence of cell
- changes caused by HPV infection (just like, if you're exposed to the flu but
- don't 'catch', you have no symptoms of the flu).
-
- > 4) Cervical Dysplasia can be carried by men. ??
-
- Again, cervical dysplasia is a symptom, not a disease. Men cannot have this
- symptom because they don't have a cervix on which to have the dysplasia. :-)
- However, HPV -- which causes cervical dysplasia -- is pretty well demonstrated
- to be a sexually transmitted disease (STD), which means that a man can be a
- carrier of HPV and transmit it to a female sexual partner. Usually both
- partners are treated for HPV simultaneously, so that they don't keep reinfecting
- one another.
-
- > 5) It is totally treatable, and any re-occurrence is a new infection. ??
-
- Yes, with a hedge or 2. Hedge #1: If BOTH partners are not treated and CURED
- of it at the same time, they can keep re-infecting each other over & over again
- even though neither one is exposing him- or herself to it elsewhere. Hedge #2:
- SOME (I believe 2/23) HPV viruses have been implicated in the development of
- cervical cancer, when left untreated. This is why it is important to treat HPV
- infections and cure them. If left untreated for a very long time, to the point
- at which cancerous changes are occuring in the infected cervix, the notion of
- "totally treatable" takes on a different tone. Then you have to be concerned
- about treating the cancer, not just the HPV. While EARLY cervical cancer is
- one of the MOST curable cancers (maybe second only to some skin cancers), it
- does have a slightly lower cure rate than 100%, which is why you don't want to
- let it develop in the first place.
-
- > 6) If antibiotics are used to treat CD, then mustn't it be a bacteria?
-
- I believe Flagyl is most commonly used, and it is not a bacterial antibiotic.
-
- > Any help would alleviate a lot of confusion for me.
- > Thanks very much in advance.
-
- I think your questions are a VERY good indication of why a physician treating a
- STD in a patient REALLY ought to make an effort to speak to BOTH partners about
- the disease. It requires knowledge & cooperation & commitment on the parts of
- BOTH partners to clear up a STD, & it seems that this would best be facilitated
- by having both partners meet together with the physician -- to educate & treat
- them *as a couple* -- which is who really has the STD, not one of them alone.
- Just MHO. Hope this helps.
-
- ------------------------
- Ruth Ginzberg <rginzberg@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Philosophy Department;Wesleyan University;USA
-