home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!news.cerf.net!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!cs.utk.edu!memstvx1!connolly
- From: connolly@memstvx1.memst.edu
- Newsgroups: sci.lang
- Subject: Re: Tones in PIE?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.121440.5223@memstvx1.memst.edu>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 12:14:40 -0600
- References: <1993Jan16.185630.25871@enea.se> <1993Jan17.075558.5069@memstvx1.memst.edu> <1993Jan26.155215.9787@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Organization: Memphis State University
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1993Jan26.155215.9787@leland.Stanford.EDU>, alderson@cisco.com (Rich Alderson) writes:
-
- [splendid stuff omitted]
-
- > After all, it wasn't until 1925 that Kurylowicz put forth
- > convincing evidence that Hittite h and PIE shwa were connected.
-
- Wasn't it 1927? No matter; it was convincing. What I've never understood
- was why towards the end of his life he backed away from these early
- findings almost totally, attributing scores of things to analogy that he
- had once -- rightly, I think -- connected with laryngeals.
-
- --Leo Connolly
-