home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / sci / environm / 14869 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-28  |  1.1 KB  |  29 lines
  1. Newsgroups: sci.environment
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU!CSD-NewsHost!jmc
  3. From: jmc@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (John McCarthy)
  4. Subject: Re: Another ozone question
  5. In-Reply-To: dietz@cs.rochester.edu's message of 27 Jan 93 01:53:16 GMT
  6. Message-ID: <JMC.93Jan26211304@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>
  7. Sender: news@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU
  8. Reply-To: jmc@cs.Stanford.EDU
  9. Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
  10. References: <1k3fo2INN29k@gap.caltech.edu> <1993Jan26.173513.1@cubldr.colorado.edu>
  11.     <1993Jan26.175921.1@cubldr.colorado.edu>
  12.     <1993Jan27.015316.13546@cs.rochester.edu>
  13. Date: 26 Jan 93 21:13:04
  14. Lines: 13
  15.  
  16. I think the non-chemists may need it pointed out that molecular oxygen
  17. O2 and ozone O3 are always being converted back and forth.  How much
  18. ozone there is relative to molecular oxygen depends on the rates of
  19. these processes, and these are affected by substances present in small
  20. quantities.
  21.  
  22. What else is involved?
  23.  
  24. --
  25. John McCarthy, Computer Science Department, Stanford, CA 94305
  26. *
  27. He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  28.  
  29.