home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!dime!chelm.cs.umass.edu!yodaiken
- From: yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken)
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Subject: Re: Greenpeace press releases -- fact or fiction?
- Keywords: not in MY septic tank...
- Message-ID: <59085@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 05:06:29 GMT
- References: <1993Jan24.202500.2302@truffula.sj.ca.us> <1993Jan24.230504.22770@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> <C1Dvpn.92G@world.std.com>
- Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu
- Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <C1Dvpn.92G@world.std.com> moroney@world.std.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
- >constant@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Tino) writes:
- >
- >>In article <1993Jan24.202500.2302@truffula.sj.ca.us> cls@truffula.sj.ca.us (Cameron L. Spitzer) writes:
- >>>The scandal is that plutonium was released at all, not in what
- >>>concentration it was released. It shows the plant is not being
- >>>operated responsibly.
- >
- >>Every time a neutron hits a U-238 atom (occurs naturally, from a few ppm in
- >>seawater to many percent in ore) and is absorbed, a U-239 atom results, which
- >>kicks off a beta to get to Np-239, and another one to become Pu-239, the
- >>Great Satan (tm).
- >
- >Also, there were several tons of plutonium released into the environment
- >over the course of atmospheric atomic weapons testing by the US, USSR and
- >the others. This is still in the environment. So, while Greenpeace
- >can rightly be upset that this plutonium got into the environment,
- >they can't say that finding a tiny trace of plutonium is proof of
- >Sellafield's lax operation.
-
- Since Sellafield is acknowledged to be pumping Pu into the Irish sea,
- on purpose, and since the British government has had to actually move
- some beaches near Sellafield, and since there was a major fire at
- Sellafield in the 1950's, we know that "tiny trace" quantities are not
- as issue here.
-
- --
-
-
- yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu
-
-