home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.energy
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!news.kpc.com!kpc!kevinc
- From: kevinc@solman.kpc.com (Kevin Cameron)
- Subject: Re: Why not 120 VDC ? Why invert?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.220835.8475@kpc.com>
- Sender: usenet@kpc.com
- Organization: Kubota Pacific Computer
- References: <1993Jan23.000753.14523@michael.apple.com> <1jr751INN16a@gap.caltech.edu> <1993Jan25.014943.1904@michael.apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:08:35 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1993Jan25.014943.1904@michael.apple.com>, ems@michael.apple.com (E. Michael Smith) writes:
- |> In article <1jr751INN16a@gap.caltech.edu> carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU writes:
- |> Blanket statements don't always hold ... speaking of which, what
- |> non-resistive electric blankets are you aware of? ;-)
-
- Hey. I think you're on to something there. Thing of all of the
- energy that's being WASTED in the world by heating blankets with electrical
- energy. What this world needs is a gas heated blanket!!
-
- Them we'll send one to Saddam.
-
- --
- Kevin Cameron
-
- "Those who will trade essential liberty for promise of security will
- have neither" - Benjamin Franklin
-