home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.energy:7132 talk.environment:5646
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!air.atmo.arizona.edu!471-1
- From: 471-1@air.atmo.arizona.edu (E. Shane Jimerfield)
- Newsgroups: sci.energy,talk.environment
- Subject: Re: Energy Strategy and Global Warming
- Keywords: energy efficiency CO2 abatement cost effective
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.061857.11301@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
- Date: 22 Jan 93 06:18:57 GMT
- References: <1993Jan20.130020.13824@aisb.ed.ac.uk> <1993Jan20.130701.14221@aisb.ed.ac.uk> <1993Jan21.230554.28718@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Sender: news@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu
- Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1993Jan21.230554.28718@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> constant@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Tino) writes:
- >
- >But Greenpeace grossly condradicts itself on this issue.
- >
- >Greenpeace says:
- >1. CHP can double (or more) the efficiency by sending waste heat to nearby
- > city buildings (and it is a LOT of waste heat, I might add).
- >
- >2. You're not going to build a nuke/coal plant in my backyard!
- >
- >
- >Also, can you imagine if a nuke plant was CHP?
- >
- >Greenpeace: "You mean that steam passed through a steam genenerator that
- >was in a RADIOACTIVE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT! Shut it down! Shut it down!"
- >
- >Get real. You can't have it both ways.
- >
- >Tino
- >--
- This is a speculative statement. Please ignore it, said the Judge
- to the jury.
-
-
- --
- Take 'er easy.... Shane
- .watch out for the lightning (a large-scale high-tension natural electric
- discharge in the atmosphere)......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- ..informal... a sudden usually improbable stroke of fortune.......
-