home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!louie!udel!princeton!elan!nfs
- From: nfs@elan (Norbert Schlenker)
- Subject: Re: Money Supply (Re: WELLLLL! IT'S DAY ONE)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan28.141012.4662@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: elan.princeton.edu
- Organization: Department of Computer Science, Princeton University
- References: <1993Jan25.201022.18348@Princeton.EDU> <kbanaian.207.0@bernard.pitzer.claremont.edu> <1993Jan27.195957.14893@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 14:10:12 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- It's always embarrassing to follow up one's own article.
-
- In article <1993Jan27.195957.14893@Princeton.EDU> nfs@elan (Norbert Schlenker) writes:
- >As for components of M1, though, there's a big difference. Barron's
- >shows:
- > Travelers Demand NOWs &
- > Date Currency1 checks2 deposits3 SuperNOWs
- > --------------------------------------------------------------
- -----
- > 1991-DEC. 267.3 8.2 289.5 333.2
- >...
- > 1992-DEC. p 392.5 8.6 338.9 280.5
- >
- >See the $100 billion difference in currency circulating in December
- >1992? Note that the Barron's components actually add up to the M1
- >figures, and the entire M1 increase is accounted for by the (50%)
- >increase in currency.
- >
- >Does anybody have the real numbers?
-
- Having examined the series in back issues of Barron's, I think the
- currency figures for Dec 1992 are mistaken (high by $100 billion).
- The NOW figures are likely too low by $100 billion. My apologies.
-
- Norbert
- nfs@cs.princeton.edu
-