home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!cmk
- From: cmk@athena.mit.edu (Charles M Kozierok)
- Subject: Re: Surviving Hyper-Inflation
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.151554.5312@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: vongole.mit.edu
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- References: <1993Jan18.004128.5655@midway.uchicago.edu> <1993Jan18.030536.27897@athena.mit.edu> <1993Jan22.061857.22935@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 15:15:54 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1993Jan22.061857.22935@midway.uchicago.edu> thf2@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
- >In an era with 4% inflation and $4 trillion, inflation shrinks our national
- >debt by $160 billion every year. Not including this shrinkage overstates
- >the actual harm done by the deficit.
-
- ok, i understand what monetizing the debt means (don't know why i
- didn't get your previous point...).
-
- of course, raising inflation is a good way to reduce the effect of debt.
- was done to perfection by Germany in the 20's.
-
- the problem is that we have to pay interest on this debt, and inflation
- is stable enough that it is being incorporated into interest rates.
- investors are also starting to demand a risk premium from the US gov't,
- based on articles i have read looking at the yield curve.
-
- the real point, however, is that the monetization of the debt is
- going to happen independently of expenditures anyway. if we ran
- a balanced budget for the next 100 years, the 4 trillion might be
- insignificant at that time. but we continue to grow the debt at
- a much higher rate than we can monetize it.
-
- also, i think when all is said and done, the '92 deficit will be
- much closer to $400B than anyone wants to admit now.
-
- --
- charles
-