home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!nott!uotcsi2!news
- From: cbbrowne@csi.uottawa.ca (Christopher Browne)
- Subject: Re: Inflation
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.040507.5588@csi.uottawa.ca>
- Sender: news@csi.uottawa.ca
- Nntp-Posting-Host: prgf
- Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Ottawa
- References: <1993Jan21.041545.286@athena.mit.edu> <2259@blue.cis.pitt.edu> <1993Jan21.211300.8065@athena.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 04:05:07 GMT
- Lines: 53
-
- In article <1993Jan21.211300.8065@athena.mit.edu> cmk@athena.mit.edu (Charles M Kozierok) writes:
- >In article <2259@blue.cis.pitt.edu> wbdst+@pitt.edu (William B Dwinnell) writes:
- >>Yes, some inflation is natural, and some is caused my economic policies
- >>of the government. But why do you limit your explanation of inflation
- >>to the eexxx effects of money, and supply and demand? The reason for
- >>inflation happens before we even get to the market: the seller has
- >>forsaken some amount of value of the item in question, by waiting-
- >>that is, by sliding through time. When the xxxx they finally get to
- >>the market, supply and demand schedules have already moved, and the
- >>seller has lost. In truth, inflation of prices could occur in an economy
- >>of hammers and banaanaxxxx bannanas. Remember supply and demand only
- >>reflect underlying economic conditions, and the reason for inflation
- >>is one of those conditions, not part of S/D.
- >
- >i really don't understand what you are trying to say here.
- >inflation simply means an increase in prices. if the price of hammers
- >in terms of bananas increases, then there is "price inflation"
- >of hammers in terms of bananas. but that would only happen due to
- >market effects. and when the number of bananas needed to buy a hammer
- >increased, people would start making more hammers and growing fewer
- >bananas. eventually an equilibrium, or at least a stable cycle
- >would be reached. you wouldn't see the inflation continue endlessly.
- >
- >please explain the point you are trying to make here.
-
- A) Inflation that happens due to "market effects" is still inflation.
-
- B) You're assuming that there will be a final equilibrium. In a
- dynamic system, there's no certainty of any final equilibrium.
-
- C) Currency as currency has no intrinsic value; it is only valuable
- when it is actually used. Fiat currencies have no other value;
- commodity currencies may have some alternative valuation.
-
- The point is that money that is hoarded isn't terribly USEFUL; it's
- only valuable when you actually buy something with it.
-
- Is it not a truism that it is better to get $1 today than it is to get
- $1 tomorrow? I'd rather get the buck today, REGARDLESS of any
- inflation. That preference will in fact create a certain amount of
- inflation.
-
- The extent to which people prefer to receive money now as opposed to
- later will create a latent amount of inflation. It is sometimes
- described as the "real" interest rate, and I hear that it's considered
- to be between 3% and 6%. This might be considered a "floor" that
- indicates some basic level of inflation.
-
- --
- Christopher Browne | PGP 2.0 key available
- cbbrowne@csi.uottawa.ca |======================================
- University of Ottawa | Genius may have its limitations, but
- Master of System Science Program | stupidity is not thus handicapped.
-