home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / sci / cognitiv / 1032 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-25  |  1.2 KB
  1. Xref: sparky sci.cognitive:1032 comp.ai.philosophy:7382
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!pa.dec.com!engage.pko.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!gvaadg.enet.dec.com!eriksson
  3. From: eriksson@gvaadg.enet.dec.com
  4. Newsgroups: sci.cognitive,comp.ai.philosophy
  5. Subject: RE: AI vs Cognitive Science vs Cognitive Psychology (long)
  6. Message-ID: <1993Jan25.085716.7194@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
  7. Date: 25 Jan 93 08:57:16 GMT
  8. References: <C1BDyn.4vB@cs.bham.ac.uk> <24JAN93.19042016@skyfox>
  9. Sender: eriksson@gvaadg.enet.dec.com (This is not a personal name)
  10. Reply-To: eriksson@gvaadg.enet.dec.com
  11. Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
  12. Lines: 15
  13.  
  14.  
  15. In article <24JAN93.19042016@skyfox>, meagher@skyfox writes:
  16. |>    I don't want to argue for the long-term distinguishability of 
  17. |>cog. sci., cog. psyche, and cog. neuro, however I do think that presently
  18. |>there are some distinguishing features of these areas that arise for
  19. |>reasons having to do with "stabalizing" factors inherent in science.  
  20. |>refers to self-authenticating techniques that "harmonize" data, theory, and
  21. |>methods (for more, see recent writings by Hacking).  
  22.  
  23. Could you give references to the articles/books (Hacking's) you're referring
  24. to?
  25.  
  26. Jan Eriksson
  27. Digital Equipment
  28. Geneva,Switzerland
  29.