home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.astro
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!fmsrl7!lynx.unm.edu!zia.aoc.nrao.edu!laphroaig!cflatter
- From: cflatter@nrao.edu (Chris Flatters)
- Subject: Re: Planetary Ephemeris Routines?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.182648.7390@zia.aoc.nrao.edu>
- Sender: news@zia.aoc.nrao.edu
- Reply-To: cflatter@nrao.edu
- Organization: NRAO
- References: <1993Jan21.190232.1729@ryn.mro4.dec.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 18:26:48 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article 1729@ryn.mro4.dec.com, randolph@est.enet.dec.com (Tom Randolph) writes:
- >
- >In article <3190@tymix.Tymnet.COM>, kopfj@bert.Tymnet.COM (John Kopf, X6305) writes...
- >>I suspect that a FAQ describing common algorithms in ALGEBRA (rather than in a
- >>particular computer language) would be welcome by many...I really hate the common
- >>practice of displaying programs in BASIC, as it is most difficult to transcribe to
- >>some other language.
- >>
- >>A discussion of "precision" would also be useful for those of us who are not
- >>numerical analysts.
- >>
- >>JK
- >
- >This would quickly expand to occupy megabytes, which I imagine is why no one
- >ever posts it here. There's really no way to give it proper treatment without a
- >whole book's worth of formulae... hence the book references. "Astronomical
- >Algorithms" by Meeus is excellent.
-
- Unfortunately his discussion of numerical precision is very outdated. Almost
- anything you are likely to have on your desk these days will maintain much
- better precision than Meeus would lead you to believe (most machines will
- only lose one bit of precision in subtraction no matter how close the numbers
- being subtracted for example).
-
- Chris Flatters
- cflatter@nrao.edu
-
-