home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / rec / guns / 20376 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-28  |  922 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!smoke.brl.mil
  2. From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
  3. Newsgroups: rec.guns
  4. Subject: Re: Glock vs. Sig!?
  5. Message-ID: <19612@smoke.brl.mil>
  6. Date: 27 Jan 93 03:36:13 GMT
  7. Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
  8. Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Lab, APG MD.
  9. Lines: 11
  10. Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
  11.  
  12.  
  13. In article <1993Jan25.200540.3372@email.tuwien.ac.at> holger@vmars.tuwien.ac.at (Holger Reusch (Dipl. Gerhard + Joe)) writes:
  14. #-  In case of misfire, the Glock trigger can't be pulled again
  15. #   without racking the slide.  Same situation as with SA pistols.
  16. #   With the SIG I have the additional option of pulling the
  17. #   trigger again.
  18.  
  19. But one could alternatively say that with a Glock one doesn't even
  20. THINK about wasting time pulling the trigger repeatedly when it isn't
  21. going to help anyway..
  22.  
  23.