home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!dtix.dt.navy.mil!mimsy!pica.army.mil
- From: erudnick@pica.army.mil (FSAC-SID)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Re: SIG Sauer P226: I now understand the cult
- Message-ID: <9301261251.aa27812@claudius.pica.army.mil>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 03:39:12 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Lines: 17
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
-
- James P. Callison writes:
- #Oh, no, no ,no, it's aesthetically beautiful, as well. It's no P210, but it's
- #no Colt 2000, either... :-)
-
- I think your grammar needs work. You are correct that the sheet metal SIG is
- uglier than the Colt 2000, but you phrased it wrong.
-
- :)
-
-
-
- Ed Rudnicki erudnick@pica.army.mil All disclaimers apply
- Protect the Second Amendment - boycott Ruger products
- Geordi: "...it's like the laws of physics went right out the
- window." Q: "And why shouldn't they? They're so inconvenient."
-
-