home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!mimsy!chpc.org
- From: rboudrie@chpc.org (Rob Boudrie)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Re: home protection concerns
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.165304.13678@chpc.org>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 01:50:33 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Organization: Center For High Perf. Computing of WPI; Marlboro Ma
- Lines: 28
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
- In article <81665@hydra.gatech.EDU> gus@prism.gatech.edu (gus Baird) writes:
- #
- #In article <1993Jan24.071954.11497@chpc.org> rboudrie@chpc.org (Rob Boudrie) writes:
- # >In article <JANECZKO.93Jan20222918@csd630a.erim.org> janeczko@csd630a.erim.org (Mike Janeczko) writes:
- # >No matter how good you are at reloading, you're not going to match
- # >the process control and monitoring of a "real" ammo factory (note
- # >that I am excluding "private label small volume" ammo like MagSafe
- # >where you merely buy someone else's reloading service).
- #
- #I think this is baloney. What "real" factory
- #
-
- Add :
-
- * Makes the outer jacket by melting the lead awar from a semi hackated round
- held over a propane torch.
-
- * Places the shot in this jacket with tweezers.
-
- * Does not use automated inspection equipment and statistical process
- control.
-
- * Does not load in a humidity controlled environment.
-
- * Performs extensive analysis on each batch of powder, including
- instrumented pressure tests.
-
- rob b.
-