home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!andrew.cmu.edu
- From: mf3s+@andrew.cmu.edu (Martin David Frankel)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Re: the spirit of rec.guns
- Message-ID: <EfMk3eG00iUyA2cRt6@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 01:04:49 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Lines: 44
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
- In-Reply-To: <C1736A.44u@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
-
- About this idea of putting subject keywords at the beginning of each
- subject line:
-
- I think one problem that has to be faced is that it is easier to propose
- a neat idea than to actually make it happen. What if people don't use
- these keywords, or use the wrong one? Will the moderator have to fix /
- add the correct keyword? Sounds like more work, not less. What about
- newcomers?
- [MODERATOR: I don't think the moderator is likely to fix those
- things.... ]
-
- Bottom line: in my opinion, there should not be more than four or five
- standard, accepted keywords, specifying broad categories. Otherwise the
- complexity level will be too high to ensure general acceptance, and the
- initial goal (categorizing posts) will be lost.
-
- Maybe:
-
- [PISTOL] (approx 35% of posts)
- [RIFLE] (approx 20% of posts)
- [RELOAD] (approx 15% of posts)
- [OTHER] (approx 30% of posts)
- [MODERATOR: Actually, "other" is easily denoted by the absence of
- the keyword.... ]
-
- This is just an initial approximation, completely off the top of my
- head, but I think it would categorize most posts well.
-
- Another consideration is that many newsreaders show only about 30 to 40
- characters of the subject line, and hence it would be a good idea to
- make short (less than 10 character) keywords. Again, this precludes a
- large variety of keywords, unless a great deal of abbreviation were
- done, which would create difficulties for newcomers and novices.
-
- Just my two cents...
-
- -- Martin
-
- [MODERATOR: Conventions like these appear elsewhere in the net, e.g.
- there are conventions for posting multiple uuencoded image files over
- in the sources directories, with subject line set up so that a decoder
- can reconstruct the original file automatically. What is your opinion
- of the effectiveness over there? Is it just not worth the bother for us
- to fool with it here?]
-