home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!cs.umd.edu!purtilo
- From: purtilo@cs.umd.edu
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: belt rigs
- Message-ID: <63646@mimsy.umd.edu>
- Date: 23 Jan 93 02:20:02 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Lines: 29
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
- Now here's a question about something I know I've seen a bunch of times,
- but now that I think of it I can't remember how it typically looks ....
-
- With a fellow shooter, I was talking about belt rigs (whether for IPSC or duty)
- for one's sidearm, and we couldn't quite figure out whether the usual practice
- is to have a "normal" belt to hold up one's pants then place a heavier duty
- belt OVER the normal one ... OR, to lace the duty belt through one's pants
- loops, and fuss around to get the holsters, utility and doodad holders in place
- as you install it. Seems like two belts is bulky, but I know I've seen where
- officers would quickly undue the duty belt with gear in order to pass to a
- fellow officer (during climbing or some wierd activity). And doing neither
- (that is, not wearing any belt in pants loops, and just buckling the duty
- rig around you quickly) is a direct invitation to heckling as fellows with
- a figure like mine find their trowsers down around the knees and a heavy duty
- belt snug up under the rolling belly....
-
- What am I missing here?
-
- I'm sure this has some obvious answer I've overlooked ... as does that other
- burning trivia question I've never had the courage to ask, which is how to tie
- one's boot laces so there aren't big loops hanging out to catch on whatever?
- [This is not the simple "well tie 'em and then roll the left overs under the
- fatigues" or "tuck 'em into the boot top, dummy" techniques; I'm referring to
- a way of lacing them such that it looks like it was done from the inside.]
- [Clearly its been too long a first week of classes if I'm so punch drunk as
- to worry about this kind of nonsense on a friday night....]
-
- Jim
-
-