home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.autos.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!usenet
- From: lusky@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jonathan R. Lusky)
- Subject: Re: Natural Gas for Auto fuel.
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.074854.29083@ra.oc.com>
- Sender: usenet@ra.oc.com
- Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX
- References: <1993Jan21.061820.19872@tfs.com> <1993Jan21.083558.19077@news.unomaha.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 07:48:54 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1993Jan21.083558.19077@news.unomaha.edu> mgolden@cwis.unomaha.edu (Brian Golden) writes:
- >johns@tfs.com writes:
- >> One thing I haven't heard about using Natural Gas is anything negative.
- >Two words: Accident, boom!
- >Mike Golden - mgolden@cwis.unomaha.edu
-
- One word: WRONG! Natural gas is gnenerally much safer than gasoline
- if the systems are properly installed. The primary drawbacks are cost
- of conversion, lack of refueling stations, and lack of range.
-
-
- --
- --=< Jonathan Lusky ----- lusky@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu >=--
- \ IRC-Op at tramp.cc.utexas.edu (Rodder) /
- \ 89 Jeep Wrangler - 258/for sale! /
- \ 79 Rx-7 - 12A/Holley 4bbl /
- \________67 Camaro RS - 350/4spd________/
-