home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ulowell!news.bbn.com!NewsWatcher!user
- From: shetline@bbn.com (Kerry Shetline)
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- Subject: Re: CD vs. LP again (was Re: Preamp and Amp)
- Followup-To: rec.audio
- Date: 27 Jan 1993 22:43:04 GMT
- Organization: BBN
- Lines: 10
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <shetline-270193174206@128.89.19.80>
- References: <1993Jan22.050702.7864@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz> <1993Jan26.174004.11597@spang.Camosun.BC.CA> <1993Jan27.051948.9556@leland.Stanford.EDU> <24721@alice.att.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com
-
- In article <24721@alice.att.com>, jj@alice.att.com (jj, curmudgeon and old
- grouch) wrote:
- > I'd go beyond that. Just let me say that reducing channel separation
- > is one way to ENHANCE imaging, to a point.
- >
- > Just think a bit.
-
- Especially if the crosstalk is polarity-reversed.
-
- -Kerry
-