home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: kirk@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Kirk Lindstrom)
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:12:51 GMT
- Subject: Re: Comments on analog music
- Message-ID: <3340424@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>
- Organization: Shredding the water of SF Bay, HP-OCD
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpcc05!hpcc01!kirk
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- References: <IfK8wlC00WBM437WMh@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Lines: 33
-
- / hpcc01:rec.audio / kirk@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Kirk Lindstrom) / 11:07 am Jan 25, 1993 /
- >(Kirk Lindstrom) wrote:
- >> and could hear that they knew what they were doing. Even now I'm leary
- >> of buying CDs unless I trust the engineering: GRP, Chesky, Schefield
- >> and Telarc though I think the first 3 are "more musical" as a whole at
- >> times. I've heard some good remastering done on the "Verve label" that
- >
- >Be careful, Kirk. I don't think it's politically correct on rec.audio to
- >say anything nice about Telarc. And to mention Telarc in the same breath
- >with Schefield? You're in trouble now! :-)
- >
- >-Kerry
- ----------
-
- Thanks for the warning Kerry. Why is it NOT PC to type "Telarc?" in
- wreck.audio? Is it because
-
- 1) Telarc breaks too many egos and systems?
- 2) Maybe they use a/d/s/ speakers for organ works which I don't see on any
- venerated "Stereophile Magic A/B/C/D/ List"?
- 3) ???
-
- Read an Interesting article today in the funnies, uh Stereophile I mean,
- while on the can (loo for Shane). Seems the guy was reviewing XLO or
- something cables and discussed how they made his base sound "faster"!!!!
- I haughed so hard, the mess almost hit my feet!
-
- So what is "faster base?" Must be a mantra or Flat-Earther's entry in some
- oxymoron contest......
-
- Kirk (talk about blowing credibility...) out
- ----------
-
-