home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / rec / audio / 19219 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-23  |  932 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!lstowell
  2. From: lstowell@pyrnova.mis.pyramid.com (Lon Stowell)
  3. Newsgroups: rec.audio
  4. Subject: Re: Digital critics - sampling argument is nonsense
  5. Message-ID: <185108@pyramid.pyramid.com>
  6. Date: 23 Jan 93 01:20:21 GMT
  7. Sender: daemon@pyramid.pyramid.com
  8. Reply-To: lstowell@pyrnova.pyramid.com.pyramid.com (Lon Stowell)
  9. Organization: Pyramid Technology Corporation
  10. Lines: 13
  11.  
  12. In article <shetline-220193135652@128.89.19.90> shetline@bbn.com (Kerry Shetline) writes:
  13. >
  14. >The reasoning is not bogus. It is both easily measurable and demonstrable
  15. >with listening tests. This idea of 'euphonius distortion' really seems to
  16. >bug you a lot, <lpfan--name deleted>. 
  17.    
  18.  
  19.    For the benefit of those LP persons unfamiliar with a dictionary,
  20.    the offishul Webster definition:
  21.  
  22.      EUPHONIUS: adjective. "pleasing to the ear".
  23.  
  24.      "sweet-voiced and musical" is part of the root definition.
  25.