home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: kurts@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com (Kurt Strain)
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:27:50 GMT
- Subject: Re: Digital critics - sampling argument is nonsense
- Message-ID: <1190791@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com>
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!kurts
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- References: <1993Jan20.211233.37643@watson.ibm.com>
- Lines: 13
-
- In rec.audio, shetline@bbn.com (Kerry Shetline) writes:
-
-
- > I just dislike the bogus reasons and unfair trouncing of digital
- > that often follows.
-
- And in the very next sentence trounces analog with a bogus reason.
-
- > Chances are that most analog appeal comes from
- > euphonius distortions that could be simulated in digital if anyone wanted
- > to try.
-
-
-