Reply-To: jj@alice.UUCP (jj, still grouchy and out of sorts)
Organization: NJ State Home for Bewildered Terminals
Lines: 22
In article <5584@othmar.lulea.trab.se> sture@lulea.trab.se (Sture Jonsson) writes:
>I suppose it is also possible to refute the claims that EXISTING digital
>products aimed at the home-market sound good since the THEORIES about digital
>audio processing says that digital means less distorsion than analog.
Well, one can try. I don't see what THEORIES have to do with it,
just try the music on people. Unfortunatley for your point,
a lot of people LIKE it.
>products, not theory) it is not only 'preference'. If it was preference, why
>is it that the digital sound has (in my ears) improved so much ?
Well, curiously enough, at least some smart people are distorting what
they record on the CD.
Yep. Uh, huh. Now, if "distortion sounds better", so be it,
but don't blame the messenger.
--
Copyright alice!jj 1993, all rights reserved, except transmission by USENET and like facilities granted. Said permission is granted only for complete copies that include this notice. Use on pay-for-read services specifically disallowed.
---------
Member HASA - Athiest Scum Division
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice" - AuH2O for President