home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!condor.hosp.med.umich.edu
- From: h198@hosp.med.umich.edu (Gene Mangum)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Subject: PS/2 95 vs 77 ?
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:35 EDT
- Organization: Univ of Michigan Hospitals
- Lines: 18
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <19930125143555.h198@hosp.med.umich.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: condor.hosp.med.umich.edu
- X-Newsreader: FTPNuz (DOS) v1.0
-
- Hi,
-
- We're getting PC upgrades here at work. There are two categories:
- regular (non-PC literate) people are getting a PS/2 Model 77 486DX2 33-66,
- 8M, 212M HD. So called "high-end" users, myself included, are getting a
- PS/2 Model 95 486-DX2 25-50 (slower), 8M, 400M HD. Eariler doc I saw said
- that the 95 would be upgradable to the P5 when available, but I'm unable to
- find that now. Other than the larger HD, which is available on the 77's
- and the additional slots/bays which I doubt we'll ever get anything to
- use them for, I can't help feeling that us high-end user's are getting
- the shaft. Opinions?
-
-
- +=================================+=========================================+
- | Gene Mangum | OS/2 ver 2 - Increased productivity |
- | Univ of Michigan Hospitals | through the use of a |
- | h198@hosp.med.umich.edu | "dead" operating system. |
- +=================================+=========================================+
-