home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!assela
- From: assela@aix.rpi.edu (A. Andre Asselin)
- Subject: Re: Borland C++: what a dog.
- Message-ID: <bkj3r!=@rpi.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aix.rpi.edu
- References: <C0tEEw.Fyt@well.sf.ca.us> <1993Jan18.140727.22338@usage.csd.unsw.OZ.AU> <CFORTIER.93Jan19164316@genghis.news> <1993Jan20.140136.8695@cci632.cci.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 07:24:09 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- rom@cci632.cci.com (Rudynell S. Millian) writes:
- >In article <CFORTIER.93Jan19164316@genghis.news> cfortier@genghis.news (Chris Fortier) writes:
- >>
- >> It is true that there are no application frameworks (i.e. OWL) with
- >>the first release. There certainly is full RTL, BIDS, etc. support.
- >>
-
- > WHAT?! No application frameworks?! It has taken Borland this long
- >to release this thing, and now you are telling me it is not going to have
- >an application framework? How many people did Mr. Kahn have working on this
- >thing, two? The BC++ product has been in development for almost three years,
- >and all Borland has come up with is a "robust" user interface.
-
- Well, here's one possible senerio: IBM is working on an application framework
- for inclusion with the next release of C Set/2 (which will have C++).
- Perhaps Borland is going to license it? Maybe? Hopefully?
-
- - Andre Asselin (assela@rpi.edu)
-