home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!dic5340
- From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: 2.1b WPS: icon-text-background color still not there
- Message-ID: <1993Jan27.010810.15319@njitgw.njit.edu>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 01:08:10 GMT
- Article-I.D.: njitgw.1993Jan27.010810.15319
- References: <93021.194506RONY@awiwuw11.wu-wien.ac.at>
- Sender: news@njit.edu
- Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
-
- In article <93021.194506RONY@awiwuw11.wu-wien.ac.at> RONY@awiwuw11.wu-wien.ac.at (FLATSCHER Rony) writes:
- >Therefore people suggested that the icon-text should get its own
- >background color, which would be present all the time, so the background
- >picture would not hamper people reading the icon-text. Optionally, the
- >background color of icon-text could be as a default "screen" as is the
- >case with painting icons (i.e. the way it is now).
-
- They wouldn't even need a new color. If they wish, they can use the
- desktop's own background color as icont-text-background. Since the
- desktop is being covered by a bitmap, the color table entry is unused,
- anyway.
-
-
- --
- |) David Charlap | .signature confiscated by FBI due to
- /|_ dic5340@hertz.njit.edu | an ongoing investigation into the
- ((|,) | source of these .signature virusses
- ~|~
-