home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.misc:43811 comp.os.os2.advocacy:12696 alt.startrek.creative:3126
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!usenet
- From: rhaig@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Robert Haig)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.startrek.creative
- Subject: Re: IBM and Borg analogy
- Date: 24 Jan 1993 06:16:35 GMT
- Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
- Lines: 25
- Distribution: comp
- Message-ID: <1jtc83INNqbg@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
- References: <SHABBY.93Jan23104941@deathtongue.mit.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: tramp.cc.utexas.edu
-
-
- In article <SHABBY.93Jan23104941@deathtongue.mit.edu> you write:
- >
- >We are IBM.
- >Downsizing is irrelevant.
- >Client-server is irrelevant.
- >You will be assimilated.
- >Mainframes will preva*KABOOM*.
- >
- >I am Hugh. I am now IBM.
- >Meet OS/2.
-
- That's actually very interesting. The IBM internal name for the 2.1beta code
- is BORG. This makes for some very interesting ideas....
-
- Or you could take it a face value (someone that makes up these names is a TNG
- fan). Especially when you consider that the service pack was/is called RIKER.
-
-
-
-
- --
- Robert Haig | "Stand back ma'am, I'm a professional!
- Technician/Network Admin | What does this switch do again?"
- UT Residence Halls | -- unknown (unemployed) consultant
-